When Charles Ara fell in love, at the age of 39, he faced an anguished choice. As a priest in the Arch-diocese of Los Angeles, he had taken a vow of celibacy. But after working alongside the 28-year-old religion educator in his parish for almost three years, he felt that his vows had become impossible to live out honestly.
“I struggled with that decision,” he says. “I agonized over it for about a year. It was probably very unfair to my wife-to-be, to ask her to wait while I worked through my own issues.”
Ultimately, Charles Ara, who still calls himself Father, says, “I decided to add love and marriage to my priesthood.”
The church did not look kindly on Ara’s decision. “The pastor announced that no one could attend my wedding,” Ara says. “A bishop told my parents they could not attend.”
But on the day of the ceremony, at a parishioner’s home, his parents were not the only faithful who made the decision to support Ara. Hundreds of uninvited parishioners showed up. On Oct. 10, 1970, more than 300 Catholics watched as several married priests, one Orthodox priest, one Episcopalian and a group of nuns presided over the marriage of Charles Ara and Shirley Meyers. The wedding party ran out of food, what with the unexpected turnout, but the guitar music from the ’60s played on.
While the church does not recognize him as such, Ara, a father of four, still considers himself a Roman Catholic priest. “It affected my faith,” Ara says. “But I will always love my church, and my faith.” Ara now works as a marriage and family counselor. He does seem to miss the leadership role he had as a priest, though—he’s now running for Congress.
Ara is one of as many as 100,000 men worldwide who have left the Roman Catholic priesthood, many of them in order to marry. In the United States there are as many as 20,000 married priests (conservative estimates put the number lower; there exists no official figure). Thousands of these men have taken a certain Canonical law to heart: Once a priest, always a priest.
Despite the fact that the Church hierarchy no longer recognizes their right to officiate, they still perform weddings, baptisms, and even the occasional Mass. The Church may have turned its back on them, but these men still have hope for the Church. They represent an organized, vocal and dedicated group at the margins of Catholic life in the United States and Europe. They may even represent the Church’s best hope for the future.
Today’s Catholic Church has been watching its moral authority erode with every damaging headline about sexual abuse by its priests. The Church’s veil of secrecy—its policy of keeping victims quiet with expensive settlements and shuffling abusers quietly from parish to parish—has exploded in its face. That known child molesters were quietly shifted around within the church throws a criminal taint onto the entire hierarchy. And the irony is not lost on married priests: While they neither harmed minors nor lied about their sexual choices, the church abandoned them, often dramatically, at the same time that it shielded sexual predators.
The scandal is bringing new, intense pressure to bear on an organization with a long history of dedicated resistance to change. But resistance may be wavering. Gallup polls show that three in four Catholics in America believe the Church has been handling the scandals badly. And in June, at a conference in Dallas, Texas, the bishops’ statements showed that they are more sensitive than ever to public opinion. On July 20, Voice of the Faithful (VOTF), www.voiceofthefaithful.org, an influential new lay organization, is holding a conference in Boston in an attempt to galvanize further change and provide a forum for the Catholic public. The bishops will be paying attention.
“The space holds 5,000 and we are expecting to fill it,” says Mike Emerton, a VOTF spokesperson. Besides supporting victims of abuse and priests of integrity, Voice of the Faithful’s primary goal is to push for the laity’s inclusion in Church governance.
There’s a lot more at stake than just arcane questions of Church governance. The laity’s role is crucial: It’s the central axis that connects a host of hot-button issues for Catholic America—optional celibacy for priests, birth control and the ordination of women.
“The underpinning of all this is really a level of diametric opposition of two totally different worldviews about what the Church is supposed to be,” says Russ Ditzel, an activist for a priesthood of single and married men and women with the Corps of Reserve Priests United for Service (CORPUS). “It’s a clash of the Church as the people of God, and as a hierarchical, structured organization.”
If the Church is forced to listen to the laity, optional celibacy for Catholic priests—which massive numbers of Catholics have expressed support for in numerous polls and surveys—is likely to be one of the first items on the agenda.
While optional celibacy is at best a remote possibility under the current Pope, in many ways it is one of the least controversial issues. Celibacy is not dogma, it’s a rule passed in the 12th century. And the Catholic Church already has married priests—scores of Anglican priests who were allowed to switch to Roman Catholicism, even though they were already married. Homosexuality, for example, is a much more explosive topic, despite the fact that some experts believe that as much as 30 percent of the Catholic priesthood is gay.
A critical shortage
Added urgency comes from another unavoidable Catholic crisis: a shortage of priests. In 1975, America had 60,000 Catholic priests; by 2001 there were just over 45,000. Their numbers continue to decline at a rate of about 12 percent a year. For individual regions, the burn rates translate into dramatic declines: In 1966 in Chicago, there were 1,340 priests. That number has now dropped to 657.
The numbers in the seminaries are even more dire. While there were around 47,000 seminarians in 1965, in 1997 there were only 5,000 (according to figures cited by Chester Gillis in Roman Catholicism in America, from the Columbia Contemporary American Religion series). Ironically, the ranks of Catholics in the United States are growing, swelling with an influx of Catholic immigrants from Latin America.
To put it baldly, the American priest appears to be a dying breed. But if the Church were to welcome back its married priests, it could increase its ranks by as much as a quarter.
“The priesthood is going downhill fairly fast,” says Dean Hoge, a sociologist and former priest at the Catholic University of America.
“The crisis over sexual misconduct only makes things a little worse.” Hoge helped conduct a 1987 study that polled Catholic
undergraduate students at Catholic schools around the country. “We concluded that you would have a fourfold increase in seminarians if you had optional celibacy. It’s the biggest deterrent.”
“There is no shortage of priests,” says Charles Ara. “They’re not using the priests they already have. I get referrals from parish priests,” he adds. “If for some technicality they can’t do it, they don’t have a problem referring people to me.”
Apart and above
“This sense that priests are set apart and above, I think that erects a structure for duplicity,” Sipe says. “This is why many priests, who are still priests, lead double lives. They’re good men, and they do good things, but they have a woman in another town, or have affairs or relationships with a man—or in the worst cases relationships with children—that are contrary to what they say and stand for in their official lives.”
Priests who marry, on the other hand, are priests who are unwilling to lie. “My experience with priests who marry is a desire for honesty,” Sipe says. “They can’t or won’t lead a double life, they sacrifice the security of the priesthood, their employment, their livelihood, status—all of that.”
Most married priests, especially those organized into groups pressing for reform like CORPUS or Call to Action, are straightforward about who they are. Some are uncomfortable with the idea of practicing, especially with the idea of charging for services not recognized by the church. But many others are hungry for reform. Several hundred are listed online in a regional database run by a group called Celibacy Is The Issue (CITI) at “Rentapriest.com.” That Web site trumpets: “We married Roman Catholic Priest/couples invite you to receive the Sacraments. COME AS YOU ARE!”
CITI was founded by a laywoman named Louise Haggett, who was moved to action when she couldn’t find a priest to minister to her dying mother. “Mom never saw a priest until she was practically comatose in the hospital,” Haggett says. “I felt so betrayed by the church. The disciples were married men. If the Berlin Wall came down, why can’t celibacy be abolished?” Convinced married priests would solve the shortage, she started a one-woman campaign to restore credibility to married priests.
By her own account, Haggett has been succeeding. Hundreds of married priests across the country are performing weddings and baptisms regularly, even stepping in to celebrate Mass if the regular priest is not available. The Catholic system allows for lay people to carry out many parish duties, but only ordained priests can give the sacraments. “There are 5,300 parishes without a resident pastor,” says Haggett. Married priests, she says, are bound to fill those holes. “Cannon 843: No priest can refuse sacramental ministry to anyone who asks,” Haggett recites. “Cannon 290: Once a priest, always a priest.”
Not everyone agrees with Haggett’s analysis, or even with her numbers. “I’m not denying it’s a serious problem,” says Mary Gautier, a senior research associate at the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate, (CARA) at Georgetown University. “I just don’t think there’s a crisis.”
Doing away with celibacy, Gautier says, would not solve the problem. “The seminaries would not fill up tomorrow with young men,” she says. “It would have some impact, but it’s a larger issue.” She describes the larger issue as “more of a generational thing.”
“Young people are not making long-term commitments to anything,” Gautier says. She admits, however, that her belief is not based on any particular study, but on her perception of young people today.
But most sociologists agree that the Catholic Church is facing a crisis. Eight years ago, Richard Schoener and Lawrence A. Young wrote, “At least among Christians in this country, the paucity of pastors in contrast with the steady growth in church membership is a crisis unique to Roman Catholicism.” Since that book, Full Pews, Empty Altars, was published, things have only gotten worse.
Days of Vatican II
CORPUS is the oldest Catholic reform group in the country, organized after the Second Vatican Council in 1974. “CORPUS is the only reform group that’s been in dialogue with so many hierarchies around the world,” says past president and active reformist Dr. Anthony Padovano. “They see us as the representative of married priests. CORPUS tries to speak within the church for change.”
Still a prominent Catholic, Padovano fits one of the most common profiles of married Roman Catholic priests in America. He studied in Rome for six years and was ordained in 1960, just before the Second Vatican Council. The documents issued by Vatican II marked an important sea change in Catholic attitudes. After Vatican II, priests faced their audiences; they celebrated Mass in the language of the people. Vatican II promised a more open Church, one more inclusive and responsive to the laity.
“That was the most moving gathering of God’s people,” Padovano remembers. “I know most Catholics don’t want to go back to the kind of church we were before.”
Padovano is one of many priests ordained in the years surrounding Vatican II, swept up in that era’s hope and idealism. According to figures from the Official Catholic Registry, the years between 1965 and 1975 showed a significant uptick in the numbers of both priests and seminarians. Father Charles Ara, in Cerritos, remembers sitting 100 feet away from Martin Luther King, Jr. during his “I have a dream” speech. Other married priests tell stories of being arrested, or sprayed with water hoses, during those tumultuous years.
The priesthood was a perfectly logical choice for idealistic young men in the ’60s. The Catholic Church has a long history of advocating for the poor and the victimized—from the Jesuits in the 18th century who stood up for the indigenous Indians, to Marinole priests who stood up for the rights of the Japanese-American community during the internment camps, to liberation theologians in the 1970s, the list goes on.
Dr. Padovano says that without a doubt, the married priests he knows come from that legion of priests inspired by Vatican II and deeply dedicated to ideals of social justice.
The eventual choice to leave the priesthood, for many of these men, was a wrenching decision. “It’s very difficult to leave something you love for reasons that don’t make sense to you,” Padovano says. “In my years of working with married priests, the harder it is for you to resign, the better your marriage is going to be. That relationship must mean an enormous amount to you, if you are willing to put on the line something that was your whole life. I never, even for a second, regretted what I did. I never questioned it, never thought what I did was wrong. But I was just...sorry, that I could not continue my work, only because I wanted to marry a woman that I loved.
“That was one of the more difficult things to try to understand,” he says. “Why marriage to a Catholic woman, to raise a Catholic family, would make me ineligible to practice the priesthood fully, especially when Christ chose married men to be his apostles.”
Padovano and his wife Theresa married in 1974. At the time Theresa was a nun, and a graduate student in his class. “I’m still crazy about her,” he says. “She’s extraordinary. Thank God I didn’t miss her. It would have been sinful for me to walk away from her. I think she was really a gift.”
Father Joseph O’Rourke, who lives in Chicago, worked with the peace movement in the ’60s and was once arrested for burning Dow Chemical files on the company’s front lawn. He got into trouble with the Church when he baptized a baby whose 19-year-old mother had expressed her belief in reproductive rights and family planning. The Church had refused the child baptism, but O’Rourke stepped in and performed the ceremony on the steps of the parish church. “That got me into a lot of trouble,” he says. He was expelled from the Jesuit order, before he chose to marry.
Says Russ Ditzel of CORPUS, “My primary reason for transitioning was the lifestyle we were required to live. It was so isolated,” says. “I found that it distanced me from the people I was supposed to be serving. That was a period of time when we were still trying to live out the expectations coming out of the Second Vatican Council.”
Robert McClory, a former priest, journalism professor and author of a book about change and the Catholic Church says, “I left partly to get married, partly because of dissatisfaction with the Church on issues like birth control. I wasn’t comfortable being the official proclaimer of doctrines that I couldn’t in good conscience ask people to follow.”
For priests like this, the desire to marry was just the final expression of larger philosophical differences.
“There’s no real justification any longer for exclusive and autocratic government in the Catholic Church,” says O’Rourke, 62. Father O’Rourke couches the debate as a fight for human rights against a paternalistic, patriarchal organization that is wasting its potential as an important moral leader in society.
“The Church could become the most powerful spokesperson for religious liberty, for constitutional and human rights,” he says “You can find this in Catholic social thought, in its advocacy of economic as well as political rights, that we feel so strongly about.”
It seems clear that these men not only represent a sheer numerical loss for the Catholic priesthood, but also a huge loss of talent, dedication and faith. While the Church may not yet have recognized that loss, many lay people have.
Paul Lencioni, a 38-year-old developer for Cisco systems, was married by Father O’Rourke, and had O’Rourke baptize both of his children.
It doesn’t bother Lencioni that Father O’Rourke no longer has the right, within the Church, to perform these sacraments. “Celibacy is a dated concept,” Lencioni says. “It should be abolished.”
In some paradoxical way, married priests may be doing the Catholic Church a favor. Married priests create a space that many Catholics trust, and feel is still Catholic, outside of some of the Church’s teachings. “We’re the sheepdogs,” says O’Rourke.
Lencioni articulates the kind of internal reconciliation that many Catholics have been making for years. Many of the Church’s teachings, especially around personal issues like birth control and divorce, have proved impossible for modern Catholics to live by.
“I think it’s OK to blend different philosophies in your own faith, and sometimes we have to do that,” Lencioni says. “Sometimes, when you make those reconciliations, your faith is stronger. It’s that, versus being unhappy with your church and moving away from it. I don’t think that, ultimately, is a positive outcome.”
“When I see the Church today, I see Masses that are poorly attended, I see people who are disgruntled. A lot of that has to do with the need for some more open thinking,” says Lencioni.
On July 20, Voice of the Faithful will gather the faithful from across the nation in an attempt to move the Catholic Church closer to the more open vision of Vatican II, toward its potential as a Church of the people. Married priests will certainly be in attendance. It remains to be seen whether they will be heard.
This article is part of a national project in which more than 30 alternative weeklies nationwide are participating. Visit www.AlterNet.org to read other stories on married priests and the Catholic Church reform movement.
A married Montana priest speaks openly about the Catholic Church
After a particularly taxing counseling session with a married couple, a young Roman Catholic priest remarked to one of his elders, “Thank God for celibacy.”
To this the 70-year-old priest replied, “Oh, I don’t know. Sometimes you get awful lonely.” In the years since that conversation, the young priest, Father Ed Frueh, came to understand what his superior had meant by this. But unlike his superior, Frueh, now in his 70s himself, hasn’t had to endure the vow of celibacy his vocation demands. Instead, he chose to marry.
Frueh’s early visions of marriage and sexuality were shaped by parochial schools taught entirely by Catholic nuns. He was taught that the purpose of marriage is procreation and that all sexual enjoyment is sinful. These ideas were buttressed when, at 15, he enrolled at the Pontifical College of Josephinum in Ohio.
“One time we were given a talk about the birds and the bees,” he says. “I remember that none of it was positive. We were all told that if we masturbated it was a mortal sin and that there are more souls in Hell from sins of the flesh than any other sin.” Frueh believes that seminary life didn’t allow him and his all-male class to mature sexually. The boys were isolated from women and provided with only minimal guidance from the priests in dealing with the changes of puberty. This, he says, “arrests boys’ development” and contributes to the Church’s now public crises of misogyny and pedophilia.
“The Catholic Church has a very negative view of sexuality,” Frueh says. “And it creates a lot of problems.”
Frueh didn’t always feel this way. But after living celibate for years and then falling in love with a woman in his congregation, he did a great deal of rethinking and soul-searching.
After studying the Bible for a way out of his dilemma, Frueh eventually took guidance from both Genesis 2:18—“The Lord God said it is not good for man to be alone”—and his heart. He married, knowing it meant losing his Fargo, N.D., parish and his livelihood. And so Frueh moved to Glasgow, Mont. with his new wife and found secular work as a school bus driver, a butcher and a baker—but he always remained close to his faith.
Over the years, he has officiated weddings, performed occasional services at the local Lutheran and Methodist churches, and even helped at the local Catholic parish—until the last few years when a more conservative priest moved in. Frueh still celebrates Mass every Sunday with his wife and any of his six adopted children or friends who care to join him. And although the Catholic Church doesn’t sanction his behavior, Frueh still considers himself a Catholic priest.
“I am still very proud to be a priest,” Frueh says, even if he isn’t proud of some of his faith’s antiquated values. “The church can do and say no wrong. Today there are no liberals in the Catholic Church. They are all carbon copies of John Paul II.”
Unlike his conservative counterparts, Frueh’s speaks articulately about such 21st-century problems as global warming and overpopulation. He believes these problems demand that the Church lift its ban on birth control. In some cases, he even considers abortion a necessity. Frueh claims that some members of the Church have been known to secretly finance abortions for women impregnated by priests. (Similar allegations—though unconfirmed—became public last year during a demonstration outside the United Nations against the sexual abuse of nuns, which was first reported in the July 27, 2001 issue of the National Catholic Reporter, then later in The New York Times.) Many Catholics believe the time is ripe for the Church to confront its own hypocrisies. Of that, Freuh remains skeptical.
“We’ve had a million chances for reform before, but they block it out in Rome every time,” he says. “And the Church has survived countless crises over the centuries.”
The fact that many Catholics around the country are picketing churches and demanding reforms will have some impact, says Frueh. But most of the changes will be cosmetic, not the complete overhaul the organization needs.
People can still gather hope from the fact that there remain many priests and Catholics who are good, dedicated Christians, says Frueh. “I guess it’s a grim picture,” he says. “But not a hopeless one.”