Black and blue 

Why are Dems continuing Republican coal projects?

Momentum is a word much loved by politicians, especially on the campaign trail and especially when they have it. Inertia is, likewise, often used to describe the state of political initiatives. But these terms have their origin in physics, not politics, and are used to describe the energy of bodies in motion. In the physics of politics, however, there comes a time to end the momentum and inertia of certain policies and projects—and that time has come for the Otter Creek Coal Tracts. Unfortunately, Democrats continue to carry forward this very bad idea from the Republican past.

Longtime Montanans know the story well, but for those new to the state, a brief bit of background may prove useful. The tale starts in the mid-'90s when the federal government bought out a proposed open-pit gold mine located on the border of Yellowstone National Park. While this was a very good and necessary move to protect the park, it came at a time when Montana was dominated by Republicans. Marc Racicot was governor and his party held both houses of the Legislature by solid majorities.

The idea of shutting down a mine didn't sit well with the Republicans, so they petitioned the federal government to somehow mitigate what they claimed were lost jobs from the non-existent mine. The federal government offered Montana $10 million, but despite testimony by the head of the Montana Coal Council urging the state to "take the money," Racicot convinced the feds to deed Otter Creek's thousands of acres of coal-bearing land to the state instead.

The problems with Otter Creek coal are many and varied. Not the least is the sub-bituminous quality of the coal itself, its high sodium content that makes it unsuitable for most current coal-burning power plants and the need to develop a very expensive and highly controversial railroad through the beautiful ranches of the Tongue River Valley. Moreover, the tracts are checkerboarded with privately owned lands. These complications are why that coal is still where it belongs—in the ground.

Racicot left the governor's office at the turn of the century, but his successor, Judy Martz, convinced the diminished but still dominant Republican majorities of the legislature to cough up $300,000 in state funds for the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) to do an assessment of Otter Creek's coal.

All things must end and, sure enough, Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, took back the governor's office in 2004 while the Legislature went through a period of identity crisis with split majorities see-sawing back and forth in the House and Senate. Although Schweitzer told crowds on the campaign trail, "The real treasure in Montana is the land, not what lies beneath it," it didn't take him long to jump on the pitch-black coal train, promoting such blarney as "clean coal," "coal-to-liquids" and "carbon sequestration," basically greenwashing the dirtiest fuel on the planet. After five years in office, it's worth noting that not a single one of Schweitzer's high-tech coal schemes has come to fruition, but his endless coal promotion caused East Coast newspapers to dub him "The Coal Cowboy," a title that still makes former supporters cringe.

As we all know, after eight long years, George Bush basically stuck his party's future in a bottle and threw it overboard as Democrats swept the 2008 elections nationwide. It is likewise well known that the rallying cry of those countless campaigns was "Change" and "Hope," led by the successful Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

We're now a little further down the line of history and instead of change, we find the blue Dems still in love with black coal—especially here in Montana. Just this year the DNRC again spent state funds to hire consultants to ascertain how much the state could wring from Otter Creek's coal if it were to be developed. As in so many pie-in-the-sky estimates we've seen come out of the Schweitzer administration, this appraisal found a veritable pot of gold waiting for Montanans at the end of the black rainbow. Billions of tons of coal would produce hundreds of millions of dollars, provide thousands of jobs and all we'd have to do is decide to lease it to the highest bidder.

To maintain the momentum of this notoriously bad idea, last week the owner of the private tracts at Otter Creek, Great Northern Properties, announced that it had signed an agreement with Arch Coal, one of the nation's largest coal-mining corporations, to lease their part of the tracts. Now, if only the state would, say, add some impetus to the obvious inertia, we'd be rolling in the dough in a few years when the market for coal, by their estimates, booms once again.

It's a mystery, when the effects of global warming are increasingly impacting nations and ecosystems across the planet, how the coal market could rebound. In fact, in the last several years, as forests die, seas warm, and myriad species face disruption if not extinction, many proposed coal-fired power plants across the nation and world have been cancelled. Add to that the huge uncertainty that taxes and policy will play in coal's future and Otter Creek looks more and more like the fool's game it is.

Unfortunately, it's a fool's game initiated by Republicans but now being perpetuated by Democrats, who hold every seat on the state's Land Board. Ironically, as the nations of the world meet in Copenhagen to wrestle with the disastrous impacts of climate change, Montana's top elected officials continue to greenwash the mining and burning of the most polluting fuel on the planet.

To get back to the physics of politics, it's clearly time for the Democrats on the Land Board to pull the plug on Otter Creek, write off our losses, bring this bad idea to a dead stop, and move on to the change we were promised and so desperately need.

Helena's George Ochenski rattles the cage of the political establishment as a political analyst for the Independent. Contact Ochenski at opinion@missoulanews.com.

Comments (8) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 8

Add a comment | All comments »

The land board decided to table the decision. did you say the most polluting fuel on the planet three times in this article? do you get paid more to repeat? i wish we would have spent all that money putting solar panels on the roofs of every house in Mt. add on a wind turbine iin every yard. then the transmission lines to sell all that excess energy to California and Washington. that has been a competing strategy for the last 6 years as well.

Posted by Al V. on | Report this comment

Al - Wrong again. The land board merely postponed the decision for 30 days. I assure you, that is completely different than tabling it. Come December, we'll see what they do, but for anyone that knows anything about what's going on with coal as fuel -- and especially Otter Creek coal -- this is just what I called it, Dems following foolish Republican development plans that will do nothing but exacerbate global warming and the increasingly evident and tragic impacts on Montana. And by the way, what's the big benefit of covering Montana with a network of transmission lines (and wide corridors) so Vegas can continue to light up the night sky with vast amounts of wasted energy. Duh!

Posted by Ochenski on | Report this comment

the world's dirtiest energy source is nuclear. I've alwasys said that we shoule explare the coal option but it looks increasingly bad all the time. the big benefit to transmission lines is that everybody can get in on the action. oh yeah, they call him manny because he has a little weanie.

Posted by Al V. on | Report this comment

A comment from this thread had to be removed because it doesn't follow the Indy's submission guidelines. You can find those here: http://missoulanews.bigskypress.com/missou….

Thanks,
Skylar


Posted by editor on | Report this comment

actually, I don't think this is a partisan political issue at all. the land board has to make the best decision for benefit of school trust. i hope they don't but if they do then it still has a long way to go before they start digging and build railroads. i also know that the PSC would have to change many of the rules before we can start generating power from our roof and make money. But it can be done.

Posted by Al V. on | Report this comment

Add a comment

Most Popular

  • Deep cut

    Most Montanans peg Huey Lewis as an out-of-touch carpetbagger here to hoard the Bitterroot for himself. When the pop star called us from a hospital bed asking to tell his side, who were we to say no?

    Huey Lewis wants to set the record straight: He’s not a jerk.

    (Features)   Jun 17, 2009

    read more »

  • Medical Marijuana - No medicine for parolees

    Convicts on parole or probation in Montana currently have the same rights as anybody else to use medical marijuana as prescribed by a physician, but the Montana Department of Corrections (DOC) wants to alter this policy because of a perception that parolees are “doctor shopping” for the legal medication.

    (Features)   Jan 3, 2008

    read more »

  • Secret weapon

    Why Montanans want Utah's concealed firearm permit

    Noah Dressel, the gun counter manager at Missoula's Wholesale Sports, has a permit issued by the state of Montana to carry a concealed firearm. But the permit isn't valid in Washington, a state he often travels through, nor is it valid in Minnesota, where his parents live. So Dressel obtained what's become the gun-lover's golden ticket—a Utah concealed firearm permit.

    (Up Front)   Jul 22, 2010

    read more »

Recent Comments

  • Re: Wine

    • Great guy and very interesting to talk to about wine . . . and CVS…

    • on July 29, 2010
  • Re: In the weeds

    • "rapid development?" since when? things kind of took a break from 2008 to the present…

    • on July 29, 2010
  • Re: In the weeds

    • State zoning law allows for ag zoning - which allows an exemption for ag review…

    • on July 29, 2010
  • Re: In the weeds

    • Is there a link to the report yet?

    • on July 29, 2010
  • Re: Our energy dilemma

    • Al V......please.......Conrad great post! truth! Lets take a look at the other side of the…

    • on July 29, 2010
  • More »

Latest in Ochenski

  • Dueling Dems

    Frustrated reps place blame on "soul-crushing" stretch
    • Jul 29, 2010
  • Our energy dilemma

    Still no real direction in Montana or the nation
    • Jul 22, 2010
  • The writing on the wall

    After failures, Democrats start to dread fall elections
    • Jul 15, 2010
  • More »

© 2010 Missoula News | Powered by Foundation