http://missoulanews.bigskypress.com/missoula/hang-the-collaborators/Content?oid=1540172 Comments On: Hang the 'collaborators' by George Ochenski en-us Copyright 2013 Missoula News. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Missoula News readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Missoula News. carla@desert.net (Missoula News Webmaster) Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:01 -0600 Fri, 24 May 2013 07:45:00 -0600 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by carolkay]]> Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:12:35 -0600 Missoula News Posted by BOB BECK]]> Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:01:30 -0700 Missoula News
Please note the most important word in his comment: goal.
Posted by Jean]]> Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:42:20 -0700 Missoula News It sounds like the folks who feel threatened by his are the same old environmentalists that just bitch and moan and want someone else to make change for them. These are the environmentalists that will have a million comments about what is wrong, but have no articulation about what should be done.
Posted by andy]]> Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:40:25 -0700 Missoula News Posted by BOB BECK]]> Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:45:50 -0700 Missoula News Posted by e abbey]]> Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:45:51 -0700 Missoula News Posted by gw hayduke]]> Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:39:15 -0700 Missoula News
When green collaborators collude with their funders to accomplish their narrow goals it makes a mockery of "conservation", and "public process".
Posted by Collaborators in Collusion with Corporations]]> Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:03:21 -0700 Missoula News Posted by JConrad]]> Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:52:36 -0700 Missoula News Posted by collaboration is capitulation]]> Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:03:04 -0700 Missoula News
Colt Summit Update: Forest Service Confirms Restoration Work Under Contract, Moving Forward Despite Collaborators' Claims

http://ncfp.wordpress.com/2012/03/05/colt-…

-------------------

More on Colt Summit and 'Collaboration'

http://ncfp.wordpress.com/2012/02/29/more-…
Posted by Matthew Koehler]]> Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:51:23 -0700 Missoula News By Matthew Koehler
Contributor, A New Century of Forest Planning
http://ncfp.wordpress.com/2012/03/07/new-r…

A few years ago I received a phone call from from a researcher conducting a study about grassroots environmental organizations’ attitudes and behaviors toward ‘collaboration’ in national forest management.

Caitlin Burke, Ph.D., with the Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources at North Carolina State University wanted to know about the factors that affect state and local environmental groups’ participation in collaboration, and how that affects representation, diversity, and inclusion in collaborative processes.

Burke set out by collecting data from eleven western states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming), conducting a survey of 101 environmental groups that addressed forest-related issues and operated in the study area. The survey gathered information about the organizations and their attitudes and behaviors toward collaboration, to test relationships between organizational characteristics and strategy choice.

Next, Burke did case study research of four organizations operating in US Forest Service Regions 4 and 6.
Posted by Matthew Koehler]]> Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:47:15 -0700 Missoula News Posted by Seen-it-all]]> Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:25:02 -0700 Missoula News