I find it so amusing that the missoula liberal, who cheered when Barack Hussein Obama claimed to be ushering in a new 'age of bipartisianship', now crucify anybody that doesn't adhere to the far-left whacko side of their own aisle. I also find it disconcerting, to say the least, that not one word is written in this article about the mechanics of Obamacare. Let me enlighten you. With Obamacare, as in Canada(where nationalized healthcare has proven itself to be a laughable and tragic failure), 2 men need a hip-replacement surgery. One man is 70 years old. The other is 39. The 70 year old learns that, after 3 months of 'review' by a bloated bureaucracy, his does not 'qualify' for the operation, and instead the 39 year old man is deemed 'satisfactory'. So basically, healthcare will be non-existence for people of advanced years. Can you imagine telling your grandmother that she can't get the life-saving open heart surgery, because, since she's already 80 years old, it isn't deemed 'cost-effective'? So life-expectancy here in America will shrink, the elderly will suffer. But i'll bet not one of you damned liberal knows anything about this, right? And who will pay? If you raise taxes on the wealthy, those evil people who pay the majority of taxes and employ the rest of us, they will have to raise the price of their various commodities to pay for it, morons! That means lower wages, higher prices, INFLATION! But I say let it pass, just how Lord Obama and his liberal automatons want it. Let it fail and destroy healthcare in America forever. Then place the blame in the next election cycle squarely where it belongs! Oops...that's racism!!
Pass it...then, when it fails to do what it promised(just like every other democrat-sponsored initiative eventually does), we can hold Tester accountable. Wait a minute...this is Missoula. We'll just ignore the fact that it was written by liberal democrats, and blame the Bush administration when it fails! That seems to be a very effective and convenient way for the Missoula liberal to remain in the state of shocking denial that they are.
We get it, McAdam: you serve and worship the united states government(as long as there is a democrat in office, that is). I wonder what the montana human rights network has to say about the grotesque oppression of rights by the communists of china...whom, as we speak, barack hussein obama is courting for a more 'friendly and open relationship' with America? I have has yet to find one word, either spoken or printed, by the montana human rights network decrying Obama for his pro-chinese rhetoric. So, I guess your organization is content on turning your backs on the oppressed people of china, just because your personal savior, barack obama, is involved? Does that mean that personal human rights only become a 'priority' for your organization if Bush is in the white house? How about it, mcadam? What is the montana human rights network's stance on the brutal human rights oppression of obama's allies, the chinese? How about making it known to obama that you demand freedom for the chinese? i suppose that would be racist, right?
Missoula News/Independent Publishing |
Powered by Foundation