A brother in Christ sent me this link and asked my opinion.
I asked my staff to dig deeper and discover the roots of these two ladies' vendetta against one another. It was determined that Carrie J is an unfulfilled spinster and Stacy Lear suffers heavily from ambition.
If these women would put down their literal weapons and embrace Christ, one another and their biological predestination of wife and mother, these charges could be dismissed and they'd each be happy. The courts cannot heal sickness of the soul, or, like claimed in testimony at the previous trial, Carrie J will commit these offenses over and over, because her heart is starving. When women involve themselves in the business of men (GUNS? POLICE WORK?) it makes them act irrationally. Fish are ill equipped to be lions, and we need both. And fish need to be fish.
Men and women are different because we have different jobs on God's earth. I don't doubt that Carrie J has done the things (repeated stalkings) she's accused of having done in the past and has been found guilty of having done in the recent previous trial involving Lear, but it's not entirely her fault. Lacking a consistent and present male companion, she's turned to female role models. It's a shame that she picked Officer Lear to observe and emulate instead of a more suitable example.
I will pray for both these ladies. I pray that they look at their lives and their choices from a Bible based perspective and make changes that will bring them to Heavenly Father and greater peace as Godly women.
Who pays for the search and rescue efforts? I hope the ones who decide to take chances like that get billed and must pay, rather than the taxpayers.
Why does it bother you so much that people want to make darn sure their kids are safe? Just because the wolves ate these kids' pets and horses in front of them and haven't attacked the kids themselves so far, it bothers you that the community built protective bus stop shelters? Don't rural citizens have a right to build whatever they want with their own money? How is this harming you or your precious wolves? Do ranchers not have a right to free speech? Would you feel better about yourself if the kids had no protection at all? What if one got mauled-even if by feral dogs? How would you feel then? Would you still feel as pretty and self-righteous as you are acting right now? What's YOUR problem?
"Has Rhoades not bothered to read the stalking law?"
The ability to interpret the law seems to have been a weak spot in more than a few of Mr Rhoades' endeavours as of late.
It could go either way, but I prefer to think it's about people harassing wolves in which case all we have to do is call up U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service — world-class wolf molesters — and demand that they lay off and clean up their act. Darry
i find it ironic that the low number of wolves taken vs. the number of permits given out is SO telling. all the table-thumping, chest-beating wolf haters out there, who think this one animal is the begin-all and end-all of all of their problems, just can't seem to muster up the intelligence to figure out how to actually HUNT it. makes me wonder just which is the more evolved species.
Idk why people keep saying that wolves need to be managed like every other animal when it's the exact opposite. I would understand the argument if they were properly managed and it was based on science and not emotion. There are thousands upon thousands of other predators in the rockies but yet the elk can't sustain 1,500 wolves? Why are grizzlies considered endangered when there are over 1,500 of them in WY and MT but there are 950 wolves in those 2 states but they're overpopulated and there's a wolf around every corner? Why are there 8,500 wolves in British Columbia, 2,300 wolves in Minnesota but ID MT and WY are so overpopulated and they're decimating everything? Doesn't make sense to me. Please name one animal that is allowed to be brought down to 100 animals per state. That's right there's none only wolves are treated this way Study after study on wolves have shown they are essential on the landscape and the myths are constantly debunked. People got nothin better to do except hate on an animal
Is that phone number to report people harassing wolves or wolves harassing people?
I'm confused about Jamrogowicz's attorney's claim that since she never threatened Lear, she therefore never stalked Lear.
Has Rhoades not bothered to read the stalking law?
45-5-220. Stalking — exemption — penalty. (1) A person commits the offense of stalking if the person purposely or knowingly causes another person substantial emotional distress or reasonable apprehension of bodily injury or death by repeatedly:
(a) following the stalked person; or
(b) harassing, threatening, or intimidating the stalked person, in person or by mail, electronic communication, as defined in 45-8-213, or any other action, device, or method.
Here's the rest of the law:
I've followed this case from the sidelines and the law is a punch list of accusations made by Lear against Jamrogowicz, and for which Jamrogowicz has already been found guilty and sentenced. The current case is an appeal to that verdict, as I understand things. I've never actually met these women, but if you google the case there is a bit of information online, and some of it is quite chilling.
Under Kim H. Carrell's profile, it states that he has no friends yet.
Take from this what you will.
Thank you Marybeth...this is the best articles I have read on wolves! I hope and pray that this country will come to it's senses with regard to our wildlife and just LEAVE THEM ALONE....END TRAPPING ALSO!
Haber and Holleman have the guts to tell it like it is. Too bad the numbskulls at the likes of MFWP are too stupid to take notice.
Well, 'still faces criminal charges' is a bit misleading. She was already found guilty and sentenced. The erratic and imploding Mr Rhoades is currently leading the Quixotic (and chaotic) appeal. This 'weird one' appears to be headed for the legal version of Ripleys Believe It Or Not as it turns into the most money, time, and resources ever spent on a misdemeanor conviction in Missoula.
Yes, your snobbery misses the point. I hope that rectifies itself soon - you'll know when it has done so because your arse will loosen up and your posture will improve. You'll feel better, trust me.
As for Eric Idle's "remark" about the other Pythons - for someone who "venerates" Monty Python, your understanding of the quintessentially English art of "taking the piss" is woefully lacking.
Josh - stop writing the things that are in my head better than I can think them. (See? You just did it again!)
Maybe you could change the Kickstarter link to the actual fundraising page: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/thegol…
It's worth pointing out that for year's Cary Hegreberg was the executive director of the Montana Wood Products Association.
During Hegreberg's tenure, the Montana Wood Products Association aggressively opposed any and all efforts to protect Montana's roadless wildlands or our old-growth forests from development, roadbuilding and industrial logging.
Anyone else in Missoula remember in June of 2000 when Hegreberg organized a huge timber industry/Wise Use rally in opposition to the Roadless Area Conservation Rule?
Hegreberg and his organization also supported any and all efforts to curb and/or gut public input and environmental analysis dealing with public lands timber sales.
113 packs of wolf with 7 or more wolf. The tribe did not count the packs with 2 or 3 wolf in Montana. Try over 1500 wolf in Montana for a minimum count. DOW does not count the wolf, hey raise money to fill their pockets from fools who fill them every month.
Missoula News/Independent Publishing |
Powered by Foundation