41 isn't the new 50
Dan—Your assertion that Amanda Curtis is a good candidate because she received 41 percent of the vote during a much abbreviated U.S. Senate run really needs to be rolled back ("Dem for the win?" Jan. 5). Your logic would have us believe that return is a remarkable achievement and given the chance at a longer effort, Amanda would surely top 50 percent, as if the political climate in Montana is somehow akin to the Tortoise and Hair parable.
To be clear, I believe that Amanda is probably well liked by the Democratic base. However, a vote for a candidate who is well liked by the base counts exactly the same as a vote for someone who is just mostly liked by the base. You can look no further than Ryan Zinke's recent victory as a good example of how this works.
It's likely that what Curtis received in 2014 represents just the base Democratic vote, with the addition of a few Independents who didn't want to vote for Steve Daines for whatever reason. That is a long way from winning. I have not read any compelling reason to believe that the Independents and moderate Republican voters needed to secure a statewide election in Montana will warm up to Amanda.
Don't get me wrong, Amanda Curtis most surely has a role to play in Montana Democratic politics for some time to come. We desperately need all that energy, and Amanda seems to have a lot to offer.
Still, Curtis emerging as the early Democratic favorite might have more to do with the jockeying of the statewide teachers organization that funds a large percentage of the Montana Democratic Party effort than any careful consideration of Curtis as a truly viable candidate. Just ask yourself if you think that Curtis can match the broad appeal that Pat Williams had when he beat Ron Marlenee by 51 percent, or Cy Jamison with just 49 percent. Because that's exactly the kind of appeal it's going to take for a Democrat to win this seat in the foreseeable future. Is your answer no? Then let's keep looking.
posted at missolanews.com
What the Travel Plan leaves out
Motorized users combined with a mountain bike group have filed a lawsuit over the Bitterroot National Forest Travel Plan. They're unhappy that some areas are off limits to their machinery. It's interesting that mountain bikers now aligned themselves with motorized users.
I went to many Travel Plan meetings. Periods were extended and record numbers of comments were taken. In no meeting that I attended did a motorized user/mountain biker discuss the impacts their recreation have on plants and animals. It was typically about their "rights."
Approximately 2.7 percent of the contiguous U.S. is protected Wilderness. Not even 3 percent of what once was remains in a "natural" state. Wanting to protect what little is left outside of Wilderness hardly seems extreme. Wanting to ensure the integrity of a few Wilderness Study Areas doesn't seem extreme. It's wise.
According to the BNF, the forest has about 837,851 acres of non-Wilderness. There are also 2,246 miles of roads. There are 543,840 acres open to snowmobile use.
The harmful effects to wildlife and wild places from motorized use are well documented in peer-reviewed science. The same is beginning for mountain biking. All recreationalists, myself included, have impacts. We could all exercise a little humility. We can go other places. The plants and animals who live there are about out of room. It's not just about us.
Consider a typical meeting with extractive representatives wanting more timber and roads, motorized users/mountain bikers wanting more areas open and environmentalists wanting more protections. Now imagine seats at the table for elk, bear, bighorn sheep, golden eagle, pica, bull trout, red squirrel, lynx, black-backed woodpecker, Douglas fir and sage. Also imagine a seat reserved for the sacredness and integrity of the Earth. The plants and animals might start out by stating many of their kind are no longer alive due to recreational pursuits, development and forest "management." They might mention that a very small percentage of their original homeland remains and ask how much more should they give. They could mention the many benefits to humans of saving what's left, such as clean water and spirituality. They may voice genuine concern for the future of their children. They might remind those in attendance that their ancestors used to co-exist in a sustainable manner with the people who originally lived here. They might make a final plea that humans alone have the capacity to make it possible for all species to live and thrive.
That would be a great meeting, and a start toward real collaboration. It would be a truer representation of all the stakeholders regarding the Travel Plan. One has to ask: How much more should plants and animals give up for our weekend warrior pursuits?
During the eight years before Obama, Bush squandered the Clinton surplus by passing a major tax cut for the richest folks, fostering deregulation and starting two wars that went on the national credit card and killed 5,000 Americans and countless foreigners (none of whom were named Bin Laden). Bush bequeathed to Obama an American economy that was losing 750,000 jobs per month and $4 per gallon gasoline. He was also torturing prisoners and overseeing a collapse of the banking and auto industries. This tsunami all washed ashore in Obama's first year in office.
I for one am proud of the Obama presidency. He regularly answers reporter's most difficult questions with dignity and aplomb. He and Michelle managed to raise a beautiful family in the middle of it all. Thank you, Obama.
Welcome in Whitefish
In a rapidly changing world, I have once again witnessed the essence of Whitefish. We are a close-knit community that rolls up its sleeves, gets things done, and takes care of each other. We may not always agree on issues, but we respect one another.
While I was dismayed by the recent media frenzy and hate language I have received by those outside of our town trying to intimidate members of our community, I have been inspired once again by the Whitefish I know and how we rally to help others, respectfully stand up for our beliefs, spread kindness, and support our neighbors. I feel confident in our local police force to keep our community safe.
Our city government listened to citizen concerns about Whitefish being identified as the headquarters of a white nationalist institute, and acted with a formal proclamation on Dec. 5, 2016. We wanted to go on the record: "The City of Whitefish rejects racism and bigotry in all its forms and expressions. The City of Whitefish reiterates its commitment to the values... honoring the inherent worth of all people regardless of race, creed, national origin, sex or sexual orientation. The City of Whitefish will continue to honor its responsibility to promote tolerance, non-discrimination and diversity within our community." Everyone is welcome in Whitefish.
Similar statements have followed by Montana's governor, Montana elected officials, the Whitefish School District, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, faith leaders of Montana, and the Whitefish Chamber of Commerce and Convention and Visitors Bureau. Their statements clearly denounce discrimination and acts of hate.
As our world keeps changing around us and challenges continue to present themselves, I ask for special attention to civil dialogue and respectful discourse as we move forward into the New Year. Please practice compassion, open-mindedness, acceptance, tolerance and kindness toward all people. A very happy New Year to everyone, and thanks for keeping me inspired.
Mayor, City of Whitefish
Regrets? A few.
At the end of a tumultuous and uncertain time, students, faculty, and the community built around the university must forge ahead bravely to determine what might make the University of Montana successful again. Engstrom must be given credit for trying, however. He did his part to trim the fat of many programs that were seeing declining enrollment, and, like a good businessman, he worked toward downsizing the less productive branches. The decision to prioritize certain programs with transparency over the process was a stroke of genius. Because no good business can expect to compete in a tense market unless its employees are also competing with each other. Besides, studies show that people are much happier to work for a boss that isn't the bad guy. It wasn't a passing of the buck or a cowardly transfer of responsibility. Rather it was a bold and brave attempt to let the programs decide among themselves who should have places in the life raft. Engstrom's shortcomings were much more to do with an inability to read the market quickly enough. Can we hold a businessman responsible for not being able to tell the future? No. The accountability should not be given to the man in charge or the investors, because it is the workers who are ultimately in charge of the product. I only hope that Engstrom's replacement possesses enough business acumen to deftly manage the corporate image of this storied institution. And my only regret during his tenure is that there were not more athletic facilities built over parking spaces across the campus.
Lessons from Princess
This past week I have been watching our cat die slowly. There is little to be done for her as she is 17 and is dying of old age, which must claim us all if we last long enough.
Our goal, that of my wife and I, is to keep her comfortable. Warm, some water. She has stopped eating.
Her name is Princess and we love her very much. We have no children and, perhaps, this makes her going harder. But I have no measure. I know a woman with six grown children who was recently deeply devastated by the loss of her small dog. Perhaps because they are so dependent upon us, we gather so much love and compassion into their time with us that their going leaves a huge hole.
Children, after all, do grow up and become independent. Our small pets—some not so small—are forever children. Our love pours out.
There are people on missions to kill other people, those they perceive as enemies, as the cause of their own inadequacy. This happened very recently in Germany, and in Turkey. This has happened in France and in our own country, and in so many places. There are people who foment anger and hatred, who dehumanize others, even though they themselves keep "clean hands" when it comes to actual physical violence. We are seeing this in Montana, and the voices that cry out against such callousness are noble voices.
But I understand those fomenters of bigotry and hatred. Though I would inflict now no misery even on an animal, I was not always this way.
I, too, was a fanatic after my own fashion, filled with purpose, rage, immense ego and an inner ruthlessness. I understand the rage of the fanatic. But it takes a person who learns nothing from life to preserve such single-minded craziness into old age.
They must be stopped, those who are fanatics, those who are as I was. They must be punished severely when they move beyond legal bounds. Still, they need to be understood, because they are always as we, perhaps, once were, or as we might have been.
Anyone who puts an idea above humanity ceases to be fully human.
Now, this Christmas season, as I watch Princess' life slowly go, I know life is simply richer in love than it could ever be in hate.
That is why God came to earth to live among us, and to die by the hand of people who placed ideas and rules above love and compassion.
Same as the old boss
The mindset of those in charge (all men) up and down the chain, is so similar to other industries ("How the National Park Service fails women," Dec. 22). They truly believe that these incidents really aren't that big of a deal, and that women are the ones who are going to be the "real" problem, with the drama they will "cause" when they speak about what happened.
The fact that this article downplayed the harassment of Mrs. Spencer is sickening ("Richard Spencer's 15 minutes are just about up," Dec. 22). The real estate agent firmly suggested that she sell her business and donate money to the Montana Human Rights Network, or else. Sad.
posted at missoulanews.com
Trump? Not a chance.
I think that we need to recognize that we are now facing an unprecedented Constitutional crisis with the nation plunged into a state of emergency, divided as deeply as during the Revolutionary and Civil War eras and facing unprecedented threats from both without and—with the elevation of the loathsome beast Donald Trump—from within.
With every passing day, Trump demonstrates his unworthiness, unfitness and untrustworthiness again and again. His cabinet picks are guaranteed to divide the nation more deeply, and his team's relationship(s) with Russia and disdain for our institutions and the free press are a clear and present danger that cannot be "given a chance" in any respect.
We are standing on the threshold of open rebellion.
posted at missoulanews.com
Follow the money
Missoula is the most taxed city in the state ("City crowd—sources tax relief with 'Betty's Fund', Dec. 15). I'm not sure where that money is going. The City Council isn't either—that's why they just called for more transparency in the budgeting process.
This feel-good Band-aid the City Council is trying isn't even a short-term solution. It's clear the city's tax politics are terrible, and hurting people terribly.
Municipal elections are next year. Vote these bums out. Remember, not a single incumbent ran for reelection last time, so terrible of a job they all did. Now if the mayor would do the same.
posted at missoulanews.com
Dr. Shearer—I disapprove of the idea of any such watchlist, and I'm sorry to hear that you've been inconvenienced or harassed by this ("Watchlisted," Dec. 15).
But I think you have it easier than, say, conservative white students who have been told point blank to shut up and only listen in some classes; or the white students who were told, nonchalantly, by black students at an Ivy League school recently that the solution to their problem of white privilege was suicide. Like it or not, the crazy (I use the word carefully) fringe of Left academia is engaged in regular, dangerous and stupid assaults on free speech, free assembly and free thought. Is it really so impossible to believe that this watchlist has been created, when well-meaning parents are sending their kids off to schools that are, to a frightening degree, telling them that they are evil and dangerous, and this solely because of the color of their (white) skin?
Here are a few questions I'd like to put to you, and I'm sorry if this seems arrogant. It is not intended to be. But the answers may shed some light on how you are perceived. Please note that this is not a request for you to answer in this or any other public forum. I would have no right to make such a request. Rather these are intended as a thought-provoking exercise, from a well-meaning Montana native who hopes to reveal some of your "blind spots" to you, and from someone who also hopes to be shown the blind spots in my own political and cultural outlook on life in the USA.
1. Do you know about, and have you spoken out against, so-called hate crimes or incidents of police brutality that have been perpetrated by whites against blacks, or other minority groups? Do you know who Freddie Gray was, and what happened to him?
2. Do you know about, and have you spoken out against, so-called hate crimes or incidents of police brutality that have been perpetrated by minorities against whites, or do you acknowledge the possibility that a minority can commit a hate crime against a white or group of whites? Do you know who Christopher Newsom was, and what happened to him? Do you who Gilbert Collar was?
3. Do you think that racism is a phenomenon that is comprised only of white actions or thoughts taken against minorities, or do you acknowledge that racism can be perpetrated against any race by any other race?
4. As you have taught your students that all institutions in the United States were created by whites to serve whites, how do you explain the NAACP, the Negro College Fund, the institution of affirmative action, the national day of recognition for the great man that was Martin Luther King, Jr.?
5. Do you condone the public statements by large numbers of Black Lives Matter members that all white cops are fair targets for murder? If not, have you spoken out against it? If you have not spoken out against it, and feel that this is an unfair question, do you think that you might be selective in which illegal and immoral statements and acts you regularly think about and criticize? If so, might this be based on flaws in the ideological nature of your thoughts on race?
6. Have you given thought to the plight of poor whites in America, of which there have always been plenty? Seen Winter's Bone? Do you consider the whites in that film to be privileged over their poor black counterparts in any way? Why?
Thanks for your attention.
posted at missoulanews.com
Dear Turning Point USA: As a socialist filmmaker who advocates for women of color and attacks the dominant white corporate culture of the USA, I feel you are unfairly excluding filmmakers like me from your watchlist ("Watchlisted," Dec. 15). Why list only college professors, who are relatively harmless? Please consider me for your watchlist, as I am fully qualified. You can check my Watchlist bonafides at my website, worldwidefilmexpedition.org. My new film, Seattle Death Trains, currently rejected at the Big Sky Documentary Film Festival, streams immediately at the website. Please watch the film and add me to your watchlist. It will be obvious within the first two minutes of the film that I qualify for your watchlist. Thank you!
Covering all the angles
I have never met Tobin Miller Shearer, though I stand beside, behind and before him.
Be bad soldiers
If the good folks among the Germans had stood up against Hitler when he had all Jewish professors dismissed, maybe the Holocaust would not have occurred. We must resist the Trump agenda on all fronts without civility and despite our fear.
posted at missoulanews.com
Defending the list
I am a UM alum, and while I never had the pleasure of a class with him, I don't believe Dr. Shearer was added to this watchlist merely for his opinions, but because he institutionalized those opinions in an academic setting. University should be a place of rigorous fact, critical inquiry, and diversity of opinion. We cannot afford—intellectually or ethically—to base entire coursework on particular ideological narratives. There exist locations where it is to some extent desirable to have people accept the same beliefs without question, to simply "transmit" convictions: church, for example. University is not one of these. So when Dr. Shearer says "I really do believe that every institution in this country was created to serve white people. I am a self-declared feminist. I am convinced that men need to take responsibility for dealing with our sexism," those are his personal opinions and convictions. If his goal is to transmit those to students whose grades depend on "getting it," then this is an exercise in indoctrination, not education. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, not so much to use a position of influence to pass those opinions off as fact. That is why he is on such a list.
posted at missoulanews.com
Being the beacon
"The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness cannot overcome it." But the darkness doesn't relent. Doing justice requires sacrifice and risk. And it makes it so clear: We need each other. We need to stand with each other. Thanks for being a light, and a gathering point.
posted at missoulanews.com
Badge of honor
Tobin, I've asked to be put on the list, but probably won't make it. I see it as a badge of honor. Brother to a Dragonfly and The Glad River are both powerful books that changed my life, and I've been thinking a lot lately about Will Campbell's willingness to sit with those who hated his life's work. It's always challenged me how he was able to sit down with those who were glad that Jonathan Daniels was killed, but it's helped me put aside judgment and understand that oppression is more insidious than we think. It affects those who do the oppressing as well as those who are oppressed. Campbell's influence is deeper than many, possibly even he, realized.
Jeffrey C. Pugh
posted at missoulanews.com
Truth to power
Tobin, thanks so much for this wonderful, thoughtful and important response. I'm grateful for this article and will be using it next year when I—another white Mennonite guy—teach my African-American history course. Your statements on white privilege are spot-on, which is why you've been targeted. Speaking truth to power, especially when you yourself are part of that power, is always a tricky business, but it's the essential work I believe we are called to do. Thanks for doing so, and for doing it with such clarity, compassion and wit. It's bastards like you that give bastards like me hope.
Mark Metzler Sawin
posted at missoulanews.com
Tobin, it sounds like you have chosen to be on the right side of history. I applaud your stand and wish you all the best. There is likely a rocky road ahead for progressives.
posted at missoulanews.com
Maybe next time?
I am disappointed that I did not make the list. Maybe it's because I retired last year. But here are a few more facts about the list. A quarter of the professors on the list are either black or teach black studies. This is four times the proportion of black professors in higher education. Second, professors like my friend Tobin make the list based on one or two sentences out of millions of words that they have spoken or written. This distinguishes the list from those published by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which looks at a long track record of not just words, but actions. As Tobin noted, the Professor Watchlist is arbitrary. Some professors are on the list not because they tried to indoctrinate some poor helpless college student. Read the sins that resulted in the listing and you discover that the key sin is speaking against gun rights or in favor of gun regulation. Overwhelmingly, professors have been listed for what they said or published outside the classroom. One can see some score-settling in the listing, too, including listing those who have spoken out against the website's owner, Turning Point USA.
posted at missoulanews.com
Thank you for the in-depth article pertaining to the situation in Warm Springs Hospital by Kate Whittle ("Ill Treatment," Dec. 1). I have been waiting for this story to come out for some time. This timing is perfect, as we are soon entering the Montana legislative session.
It appears to me that there are several issues to address in the ongoing problems at Warm Springs State Mental Hospital. These issues were explained well in your article. May I now make some suggestions for correction?
Primarily: Commission an outside professional review of the entire hospital with a report made to the appropriate legislative committee for action. Gov. Bullock could order that immediately and have it available for the session.
Second: Settle the current grievances immediately without the expenditure of limited funds for high-cost lawyers. This action would mitigate the suffering of the four individuals cited in the current complaint. Since this has been dragging on at least since September, I believe that would be an appropriate action.
Fantastic that this man was wise enough to realize his problem and get help ("Etc.," Dec. 1)! A real hero! Wish there were more like him! I'm proud of him and his accomplishment. HOOORAY John!
Public over private
I don't want to disrespect the private landowners' issues in this lawsuit, which as far as I can tell are legitimate ("Westside project barrels ahead," Dec. 1). However, from my work, which involved writing comments and the objection to the Westside timber sale, there are more profound issues that relate to the direct damage to National Forest land from logging and road construction. And, of course, the fact that taxpayers are subsidizing timber mills based upon fraudulent agency and industry "science." This pseudoscience is based on the false proposition that nature can't heal the forests, if humans just get out of the way. And that somehow these fire-prone ecosystems can be made safe for homeowners by logging miles away from homes. In other words, they want to "make the forests great again!"
This is the exact same propaganda the Forest Service is using to justify logging all over the National Forest system. And that should be of concern to all of us National Forest "landowners"the American public.
These issues get left behind when the media focus on more narrow private interests.
Ode to dead geese
I read my poem "Not Water" at the Snow Geese Memorial event in Butte after the 1995 loss of 342 migrating snow geese.
White birds get our attention because they are so highly visible on the dark red surface. Darker birds have surely suffered the same fate, unnoticed.
I submit it as a letter to the editor. It still speaks to the problem.
And I am still mad after all these years.
I am disappointed by the Forest Service's decision to continue full speed ahead on the Westside Project without taking the time to consider easy and economical compromises that would generate agreement among a broader range of stakeholders and embrace the tenet of collaboration supported by the Western Governors' Association and Gov. Steve Bullock.
The project began five years ago, with the recognition that the area around Ward Mountain required thinning to reduce the possibility of crown fires that could threaten nearby homes. Had the Forest Service proceeded with that original recommendation, the thinning might have been completed one or two years before the outbreak of the Roaring Lion fire. The hand-thinning project would have been small enough to eliminate the long process required by the Westside Project.
Instead of going ahead with the recommended project, the Forest Service added thousands of acres of logging and road construction, including a permanent bridge across Camas Creek. The size and scope of the larger project and the addition of extensive road-building at taxpayer expense required a different and much longer procedure. The Forest Service's rationale was that this would help pay for the hand-thinning. Considering the cost of fighting the Roaring Lion fire, the losses incurred, and the Forest Service man-hours involved in five years of planning, that hand-thinning project might have more than paid for itself.
All of the stakeholders involved in the public input stage of the Westside Project process agreed with the need for thinning in the Roaring Lion area. But most were opposed to roads crisscrossing the Coyote Coulee trail, logging with no buffer to protect the integrity of the trail, a permanent bridge across Camas Creek, and running hundreds of fully loaded logging trucks down narrow, winding, residential roads. These stakeholders offered a number of compromises, but the Forest Service continued full steam ahead regardless of these concerns.
Now that the original hand-thinning project area has burned, it seems the perfect time to compromise with local stakeholders and hand-thin in Unit 2 (the Coyote Coulee area), thus ending the need for the contested roads and permanent bridge, protecting the Coyote Coulee trail, and supporting the recreation industry. The roads and bridge will cost taxpayers half a million dollars. Why not save that expenditure and allow the remainder of the project to pay for the thinning in the Coulee area? Why not collaborate with the stakeholders rather than disregard them so that their only recourse is a lawsuit?
The Forest Service admitted that it did not collaborate well with local stakeholders on the Westside Project at the Western Governors' Association meeting. They said they would do it differently if they had to do it again. But why not correct this mistake now? They can still collaborate by compromising and hand-thinning in Unit 2, thus eliminating the controversial road-building, logging trucks on residential roads, and damage to the locally built, maintained, and loved trail.
To start, I'd like to say that I really enjoy the outdoors. Hiking, floating, fishing, camping, etc. The Smith River is used by many people, not only Montanans, for all these reasons. I absolutely oppose the Smith River copper mine for a number of reasons.
First and possibly most important is the chemical reaction known as acid mine drainage. Acid mine drainage results when sulfuric minerals are exposed to air and water, and this waste product will be pumped out of the mine to keep it from flooding. This process is highly toxic to wildlife and aquatic life, meaning no more safe fishing. In addition to this, groundwater pumping to keep the mine from flooding could potentially lower the water table, making adjacent streams and rivers suffer from low flows. What would all this mean for drinking water and fisheries downstream? Although Tintina Resources is managing this project, the major decisions will be made by an Australian company called Sandfire Resources, due to their financial backing of the project.
Montana is home to some of the nation's best drinking water, wildlife, fishing, hiking, floating, etc. And Montana has a long history of mining projects that have contaminated our rivers and streams. The Smith River is a Montana treasure, not a location for another failed mining experiment. Please support me and others in opposing this mine at the Missoula City Council meeting on Dec. 12 at 7 p.m.
As many know, our neighbors in Butte have suffered a recent setback as they work toward an effective remediation of the Berkeley Pit. That setback is not a concrete loss, but a semantic one—a statement from Atlantic Richfield's lawyer Kyle Gray asserting that public access to ongoing litigation would "make settlement pretty much impossible."
If we had the community in a room, together, and Ms. Gray had made that statement before a crowd, I can only hope it would have drawn a collective gasp. Her dismissal implicates us all.
We the people have been made out to be the root of every problem. It is a tempting narrative. By definition the worst and best live among us, and so we have been incrementally trained to see ourselves as unpredictable, our neighbors as untrustworthy, our mirror image as a blur of chaos and confusion.
In the context of a global culture, we are even more overwhelmed by ourselves. The internet has spread our consciousness so thin that we feebly generalize multitudes in an effort to find common reference. This is a fallacy. We the people cannot think of ourselves as one thing, least of all the de facto root of obstruction writ large. It is yet another line in the narrative that degrades public intelligence and strips us of individuality, community, and power.
The people of Butte deserve transparency, and any dismissal of that right must be roundly rejected by all. We the myriad public are one.
Dan Brooks, I mistook you for a progressive. Blaming the Democratic Party for the election of Donald Trump ("Filling a void," Nov. 17) excuses the real culprit: the uninformed electorate. Hillary was on the progressive side of every issue: civil rights, religious freedom, climate change, universal health care, income inequality, reproductive rights. The Democratic Party produced the most historically progressive platform ever, thanks in part to Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Hillary embraced this platform. You wrote as if extending the policies of the Obama Administration was a bad thing. From day one, Obama was obstructed by Republicans on everything! Who held up his infrastructure bills? Who made it impossible for our own Max Baucus to obtain universal health care through a public option? Which party denies climate change?
Rachel Carson wrote in Silent Spring, "Along with the possibility of the extinction of mankind by nuclear war, the central problem of our age has become the contamination of man's total environment with such substances of incredible potential for harm—substances that accumulate in the tissues of plants and animals and even penetrate the germ cells to shatter or alter the very material of heredity upon which the shape of the future depends. ... We stand now where two roads diverge. But unlike the roads in Robert Frost's familiar poem, they are not equally fair. The road we have long been traveling is deceptively easy, a smooth superhighway on which we progress with great speed, but at its end is disaster. The other fork of the road—the one 'less traveled by'—offers our last, our only chance to reach a destination that assures the preservation of the earth."
Donald Trump won't "drain the swamp." He is the swamp.
Beth Taylor Wilson
Please bear with me and read to the end. Sexual assault is not a topic I'm thrilled to discuss. I bring it up because it is something that needs to be talked about. I heard a statistic today that 62 percent of Americans get their news from social media. Maybe what I say will positively affect just one person.
This is not about politics, so please do not twist it into that. The fact is that the future president of the United States has made admitted sexually deviant acts acceptable as good ol' boy antics. The next four years, it is up to the good people of our nation to volunteer our time or to give money if we can afford it, to programs that we feel may be cut with this new administration. I am going to go back to volunteering for sexual assault survivors. I use the term survivor instead of victim, because I am a survivor of rape, sexual assault, attempted murder and of random stranger violence.
I am speaking up because of the recent conversations taking place accusing the women or questioning why they did not speak up sooner. And because of the comparisons of sexual assault to consensual extramarital affairs as being the same thing. No one wants to share stories that elicit emotions ranging from extreme pity to the opposite extreme of condemnation or blame. The easiest thing to do is to tell no one. I have actually been told not to play the victim, when in fact I am a strong survivor. The men who assaulted me when I was 19 were going to kill me, but I escaped. That was empowering for me.
What many people do not realize is that so many survivors of assault suffer the biggest trauma after the actual act. The trauma is the feeling of injustice. The violence is often not recognized as a crime, not to mention the usual failure of the criminal justice system. If either assault had left a larger scar on my face, it would validate the violence.
Speaking for myself, I harbor no resentment for the assailants in these crimes. I expect bad people to do bad things. It is the aftermath, when good people do not do the right thing, or do not act the right way.
I want to share this because I was listening to a young woman yesterday who was date-raped, and she did not want to tell anyone because she felt she was stupid for putting herself in that position. We need to talk to the girls and women in our lives, and let them know that unwanted physical contact is a crime and should not be tolerated. And we cannot forget about the young boys and young men who do not come forward at even greater rates.
There are many issues that we will have to be more proactive on for at least the next four years. (I know that hearing this story also elicits compassion and can be upsetting, but please, please, please... I almost did not write this because I don't want this to be about me.) We cannot let our society take giant leaps backward. An entire young generation sees that almost half of the electorate gave this man their approval.