Thursday, October 15, 2009

A clarification, sort of

Posted on Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:00 AM

Your review of Kegger credits the hippy capitalists at Rockin Rudy’s with the creation of the “A Place, Sort Of” image adorning the T-shirts the store sells. In fact, I designed this image in 1982. In its original form the flying amphibian, drawn by Jan Faust, was accompanied by the Latin words, “Vos Hic Estes,” which I took to mean “You Are Here.” I entered the design in a contest to pick a seal for the County of Missoula. It came in second. My aim for the original image and its commercial successor was to mock the self-congratulatory zeal of people who think Missoula is the greatest town in the world, apparently because it isn’t Great Falls.

Bill Vaughn Missoula

Welfare for wolves

Posted on Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:00 AM

I recently spent some time roaming around Beaverhead County south of Butte. Everywhere I went on public lands I saw cattle wandering loose without any human supervision. These cows are nothing more than four-legged picnic baskets to predators like wolves.

While I appreciate the generosity of local ranchers in their efforts to maintain fat and healthy wolf packs, I cannot condone such practices. It leads, after all, to lazy wolves. Why would a wolf spend its energy trying to pull down a sleek, fast elk, when it can far more easily secure a nice slow, fat, cow?

I am against all welfare. Look what it has done to people. We all know that welfare just promotes a lifestyle that leads to moral decay of people. People on welfare just sit around watching television and eating lousy food, and making babies. We don’t need couch-potato wolf packs.

Plus, just like all the junk food snacks eaten by welfare moms and their kids, eating fatty, artery clogging, hormone-filled cattle is not really a healthy diet for wolves either. I am concerned that our wolves are not getting a balanced and healthy diet when they spend their time munching on cows.

It’s just irresponsible and reprehensible for ranchers to be leaving their cattle all over the land so they are easily caught by wild predators. Keep in mind that what made America great is its work ethic. Welfare for wolves is not the answer. It’s time to remove all these four-legged picnic baskets from the public lands and make wolves earn a real living. Just as in national parks if you leave a picnic basket out for a bear to grab, you will get a fine. We should be doing the same to ranchers who are promoting unnatural food addictions through their husbandry practices.

George Wuerthner Richmond, Vt.

Finding a home

Posted on Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:00 AM

Thank you so much for writing the article on the wild horses (see “Alone on the Range,” Oct. 8, 2009). It is so wonderful to finally see a quality story. It seems the media and the government have always ignored these horses.

I was at the Pryor Mountain Roundup in September along with Ginger Katherns and Makendra Silverman. It was a hard and heartbreaking thing to witness. I also returned for the adoption to help Ginger transport three bands of horses—15 total—including Conquistador and his mare.

It was wonderful to be able to take them to their new 3,000-acre home at the base of the Pryors. I also adopted a beautiful little 1-year-old Gruella filly. She is home with us here in Potomac.

Thanks again for such a wonderful article.

Sandy Elmore Potomac

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Nature’s way

Posted on Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM

We all have life changing moments (see “Life-changing event” in Letters, Sept. 24, 2009). One of mine was when I found the remains of my first dog, Pluto, a great big old dopey yellow dog with a mild disposition and notable lack of judgment. He had been lured out into the dark by a pretty little coyote bitch and then her and her pals ate him! You can imagine my horror at this discovery and the resulting animosity toward coyotes.

Over the many years since I have hunted and trapped many kinds of animals, I’ve gone out on several occasions with one slow-witted old blue tick hound that I’m afraid I must confess to owning. In spite of the dog’s experience, he continued to chase cats for many, many miles up and down mountains for no reward other than getting said cat up a tree and letting him go. I used that same trap to end the days of many nasty ol’ coyotes! I never did catch any other pets except for feral cats, fattened up on songbirds, to be spayed/neutered and checked out. On the contrary, 90 percent of the animals I trapped were exactly the species I set the traps for. I always checked them promptly to avoid loss of prime hides (mostly to coyotes), as well as to lessen the suffering of the animals. After a rather touching close-up experience with a young bobcat, I quit hunting/trapping cats but still would gladly teach my grandchildren all the natural hunter-gatherer skills I have at my command, including proper trapping methodology. Nature is not merciful nor is it vengeful, it just is. Please enjoy the ride.

Bob Petersen Missoula

Firsthand account

Posted on Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM

As someone who has been involved doing guardian ad litem (GAL) work for more than a dozen years, I can surely agree with Montanans Supporting Guardian Guidelines (MSGG) that the law governing GALs in Montana needs overhauling (see “Guiding the guardians,” Oct. 1, 2009).

There certainly are GALs who are terrific, competent, compassionate and wise. There are also GALs who are horrible, incompetent, arrogant and foolish. I know for sure that’s a fact, because I am both—depending on the parent you are talking to.

But even the most dedicated of us have had to fly by dead reckoning. Under the present system, there are no rules governing the specifics of what a GAL does or does not do. One result is that we have had to more or less invent ourselves. This lack of legal structure has affected the judges, too. They have also had to make up their own minds about what the GAL should do; and any GAL will tell you that every judge has his or her own ideas about that.

I think most of us who have worked in the field would be downright grateful to have a statute that spells out with some precision what a GAL does and does not do.

For myself, I think the law should also require ongoing continuing education—in basic knowledge of family law for us non-attorneys, and in family structure and dynamics, child development and other such areas for those, like most lawyers, who have no background there.

So, to the people who got the MSGG ball rolling—you done good!

Paul W. Moomaw Missoula

Water fight

Posted on Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM

I’d like to invite fellow reader Danielle Standley and anyone who agrees with her letter (see “Flower power” in Letters, Sept. 24, 2009) about “wasted” water to consider just three things:

1. Flowers promote honeybee travel patterns, therefore furthering necessary food pollination. Gotta have bees for fruits and veggies.

2. Studies show colorful and natural plants elevate serotonin in our brains. Flowers equal antidepressants.

3. Pessimism and negativity only further our species’ inability to become a collective consciousness.

If we all took on a thought pattern of “there’s more than enough” or “our waters are abundant,” then our creative source would fulfill our intended reality.

I diligently conserve water and electricity. I reduce, reuse, recycle, compost and do what I can in these trying times. I understand Standley’s frustration, but a switch to optimism must be our path to success.

Mel Beck Potomac

Bad trade

Posted on Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM

Greedy Wall Street traders. Political favors to preferred businesses. Complex financial instruments designed to game the system. You might use these phrases to describe the sub-prime mortgage mess. However, I’m using them here to describe the proposed cap and trade system being considered in Congress.

Cap and trade creates a brand new marketplace that not only brings opportunity for investors, but also opportunity for manipulation, unscrupulous trading practices and backroom deals. The complex trading system cap and trade contemplates will inevitably provide ample room for the Bernie Madoff’s of the world to make a quick buck.

We can do better. We can accomplish the same goals of cap and trade—i.e., financially quantifying carbon emissions—by simply placing a tax on them. It’s simpler for consumers to understand and more predictable for companies to implement into the future. And there’d be no room for manipulation by market insiders. 

I think all Montanans should urge Sens. Baucus and Tester to oppose cap and trade and come up with a better solution.

Jocelyn Galt Missoula

Poetic goodbye

Posted on Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:00 AM

Cigarettes, alcohol, meth type drugs,

Hunger, poverty, air and water manmade unclean,

Hate, violence, prejudice, greed,

Religions, politics, taxes, need,

Secondhand smoke.

More?

Afghanistan, terrorism, Iraq, war…

Secondhand smoke.

Charles McGrath Missoula

Thursday, October 1, 2009

The next chapter

Posted on Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:00 AM

Alex Sakariassen’s September 17 article on Roderick Nash (see “Montana’s place in ‘Big W’”) offers an excellent jumping-off point for a closer look at Sen. Jon Tester’s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act, a bill that has been discussed extensively in the Independent and elsewhere. 

From the get-go, Montana has been ahead of the curve on the wilderness debate. It’s no news to most readers that Montana’s wild lands were the inspiration for some of our nation’s most visionary wilderness philosophers and advocates, and that several of the first wilderness areas designated along with the passage of the 1964 Wilderness Act fell within our borders. In following the story of Bob Marshall and other Wilderness heroes in his 1967 book, Wilderness and the American Mind, Nash would agree that Montana played a leading role in helping to shape our nation’s evolving perceptions of wild landscapes.

Five years after Nash’s seminal publication, Montana again took the helm of wilderness policy and guided it in another direction by creating the “first citizen’s wilderness”—the Scapegoat—which marked the first time that Congress chose to act on a wilderness recommendation not made by the Forest Service. Since 1972, the example set by residents of Lincoln and surrounding communities has been replicated countless times and in all corners of the United State, further contributing to the growth of wilderness in America.

Today, Montana is poised to push the envelope and rechart the course of federal land management once more—we are literally writing the next chapter of Roderick Nash’s book. The pages have been years in the making—they have endured edits from all sides of the political and economic equation, have suffered from rips and tears, and have gone through multiple drafts. At last, a collection of authors—fed up with years of bickering, inaction and failed attempts at communication—have come together to finish the installment.

Building upon Montana’s traditions of independence and cooperation, the authors—timber companies like Pyramid Mountain, representatives of motorized and passive recreation interests, conservation organizations like Trout Unlimited and the Montana Wilderness Association, watershed organizations like the Blackfoot Challenge, and others—broke the long stalemate and decided the status quo was not good enough. What the authors have devised is the new paradigm of public lands legislation: place-based, collaborative proposals that reflect the needs of a range of stakeholders who are willing to come to the table, work together, and produce results.

What the authors of this next chapter in Nash’s saga understand is that the gridlock that has characterized public lands management needs to change.

Tester’s Forest Jobs and Recreation Act represents an opportunity on the scale of the designation of the Scapegoat in 1972—a chance to make wilderness designation a local affair, and one that benefits the full range of people who call Montana home. It is the basis for a new chapter on the role of wilderness in the American mind.

Zach Porter Missoula

Risky business

Posted on Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:00 AM

I am writing to support Sen. Jon Tester’s efforts to work with Montanans to find creative forest management solutions with his Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. Clearly, “business as usual” forest management is not working as evidenced by important Montana wild lands left without permanent wilderness protection; Montana timber industry jobs and infrastructure being lost or put at risk; forest professionals unable to move ahead with restoration and management projects that make good sense and are badly needed for Montana’s forest health; and a legacy of mistrust between various interests with a stake in how Montana public lands are managed.

Thanks goes to the diverse group of collaborative partners who stepped up and did the hard work of building relationships with those who have different views. These groups have worked hard to find the common ground needed to create workable solutions to Montana’s forest management questions.

Thanks to Tester for listening to Montanans and moving forward with the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act legislation.

Mark Vosburgh Missoula
Today | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun
Free Matinee

Free Matinee @ Missoula Public Library

Fourth and Second Wednesday of every month, 2 p.m.

All of today's events | Staff Picks

© 2017 Missoula News/Independent Publishing | Powered by Foundation