Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Missoula airport puts privatization wheels in motion

Posted by Jessica Mayrer on Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:00 PM

The Missoula County Airport Authority officially set the wheels in motion Tuesday to replace federal Transportation Security Administration screeners (TSA) at Missoula International Airport with a private security firm.

The airport authority selected Chicago-based Covenant Aviation, which has an office in Anaconda, from three proposals submitted by private firms. Covenant provides security at airports in San Francisco and Sioux Falls, and appears well positioned to woo Montana Airport managers who are increasingly leading the privatization movement.

News_Upfront1-1.jpg
Photo by Cathrine L. Walters

Specifics have yet to be ironed out and may be tackled during next month’s airport authority meeting, says Missoula International Airport Director Cris Jensen.

If all goes as planned, Covenant could replace federal employees by September, Jensen says. But the deal has yet to be sealed. Before getting the official go-ahead, airport management must apply with the TSA to opt out of federal security.

Comments (2) RSS

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Here is the smoking gun trail from Covenant to Lockheed.

Covenant Aviation Security has partnered with several companies to provide service excellence to our clients. Our philosophy is to utilize each business unit with a focus on their core competencies. To this end we have partnered with some of the best providers available.
Below is a list of some of our partners.

Trinity Technology Group
A solutions-oriented company that provides security support for the nation's critical infrastructure and information sensitive missions and operations. Trinity is a small disadvantaged, HUBZone certified, Service disabled veteran business.

Pearson Security Services
Delivers premium security services and disaster response support.

then go to Trinity web page:

Alliances
L3 Titan Group

Lockheed Martin

Northrop Grumman

QinetiQ

SAIC

Lockheed page:http://www.lockheedmartin.com/capabilities/homeland_security/trans_security/index.html
Our Specialized Security Training contract with TSA includes basic passenger and baggage screener training, re-certification and cross training to existing screeners.

FSD and SFO are covenant security airports who did better at recert than federal airports. WHY! lockheed martin

Posted by Why Ask Why on February 24, 2010 at 8:31 AM | Report this comment

Low wages and job cuts are the the issues facing Federal employees at Montana Airports who work for the Transportation Security Administration.
Federal Transportation Security Officers make $13.50 an hour to start, after years as a federal employee most in missoula make more. They are now facing their federal jobs being outsourced to a contractor under the provisions of ATSA and the SPP. Trinity in partnership with Lockheed Martin are coming after those jobs. The reality is instead of federal money coming into and staying in the state as salary; the year following the airport going private salaries will be cut in half. In the first wave 1/3d of the officers will not be hired back (even though they are supposed to have the right of first refusal to work for the private contractor). Money once provided by we the federal tax paying Montanans will be flowing out of state.
Recent job loses in the state impact the local economy, (insert job lose numbers to Montana)
In Missoula recently Senator John Tester spoke to Greg Philips, Deputy Director of the Missoula Int. Airport and asked him some questions relating to the Airport's motivation for considering privatization. Mr. Philips stated they were motivated primarily for monetary reasons and that they were attempting to partner with a private contractor to share in profits of a federally paid contract. This as a Montana Governmental Body selling federal jobs to increase their public coffers. Will the profit sharing be equal to the decrease in salaries and benefits and the lost jobs? How will that profit be spent? On airport improvements? Who will do those improvements? Local people or large corporations from other states influenced by the partnership. Who holds the purse strings to Trinity company the one seeking the SPP contracts in Montana? If you follow it back you will find Lockheed Martin. How can a select few Airport Authority Board member's make decisions of such magnitude and consequence that effect so many Montana citizens who depend and deserve the highest level of Aviation Security that a Federal Security workforce has provided for the last 8 years? The threat to Aviation continues to be paramount and with the proximity of a foreign border in our backyard, this is not the right option for Montana airports. There are many issues facing Montana but privatizing the airports is not the answer for Montana. I ask you to continue to look at this issue and not support anymore "outsourcing" of government jobs that will leave more Montanans with less wages and benefits.

Posted by Why Ask Why on February 24, 2010 at 8:33 AM | Report this comment

Add a comment

Most Popular

  • Palin coming to Missoula, but at what cost?

    Missoulian reporter Keila Szpaller scored the scoop on Sarah Palin's scheduled September visit to the Garden City.

    (Indy Blog)   Mar 9, 2010

    read more »

  • Pot and poetry

    Montana NORML has announced a haiku contest (or is it high-ku?), and the winner will receive $100.

    (Indy Blog)   Feb 23, 2010

    read more »

  • More nuggets on Montana Pain Management

    A story in this week’s issue of the Independent looks at Montana Pain Management (MPM), a medical marijuana clinic on Third Street with some 350 patients run by Rick Rosio.

    (Indy Blog)   Nov 19, 2009

    read more »

© 2010 Missoula News | Powered by Foundation